Second Lafayette Motel Ordered Closed in 24 Hours

For the second time in less than 24 hours, a Lafayette motel along the Evangeline Thruway has been ordered to shut down following years of documented criminal activity, raising difficult questions about public safety, property owner accountability, and what happens to vulnerable families who have been calling these properties home.

On Friday (October 9), Lafayette Consolidated Government (LCG) announced that the Plantation Motor Inn at 2810 NE Evangeline Thruway had been ordered to cease operations following a court ruling.

The decision came just one day after a similar order forced the closure of the Express Inn at 1314 NE Evangeline Thruway, where some residents reported having only hours to find somewhere else to stay.

While both properties have been associated with staggering numbers of police calls, violent crime, and drug activity, the closures have also sparked criticism of Mayor-President Monique Boulet's administration over how displaced residents are being treated.

But conversations with LCG, the Boulet administration, and individuals familiar with the ongoing efforts to address these properties suggest an important distinction: While the closures may have come as a shock to residents, the legal actions against the properties were not decisions made overnight.

Two Motels, Nearly 4,000 Police Calls

The law enforcement statistics associated with the two properties help explain why local authorities pursued court intervention.

According to information released by LCG, from 2023 through August 17, 2026, the two motels generated the following activity:

Combined, the properties accounted for 3,975 calls for service, 541 police reports, and 30 firearms recovered during the reporting period.

The Plantation Motor Inn was also the location of a November 2023 homicide. Authorities documented additional drug-related crimes involving substances including fentanyl, prostitution-related activity, and other serious criminal offenses.

According to the District Attorney's Office, both managers of the Plantation Motor Inn have been arrested on drug-related charges, including charges involving PCP.

Those figures represent more than isolated incidents. They highlight the scale of public safety concerns that authorities say have persisted for years.

Why Residents Are Questioning the Abrupt Closures

The decision to shut down the motels has not come without controversy.

Following Thursday's Express Inn closure, some residents said they were given only hours to gather their belongings and find another place to stay.

In an interview with The Current, single mother Renee Brasseux described struggling to find accommodations for herself and her two sons."They could have gave us a warning," Brasseux told the outlet. "It's not right."

The frustration is understandable, particularly for families who may have few affordable housing alternatives.

For some, these motels were not temporary accommodations. They were their homes, sometimes for years.

But the circumstances also raise another question: What responsibility do motel operators have to the people paying them for a place to live, particularly when they know their businesses are facing potential closure?

Property Owners Were Aware of Ongoing Legal Action

One of the most significant details emerging from conversations surrounding the closures is that the actions against these properties had been developing well before this week's court orders.

According to conversations with LCG, the Boulet administration, and individuals familiar with the ongoing communications between property operators and authorities, management had been made aware of the mounting legal and compliance concerns.

Those conversations indicate that the possibility of court-ordered closure was not a sudden development for those operating the properties.

Despite the ongoing proceedings, customers continued paying for accommodations.

That distinction matters.

While residents may have had little or no warning that they would need to leave, the businesses collecting their money were already dealing with authorities over conditions that threatened their ability to continue operating.

The precise timeline of notices to each operator, what management communicated to residents, and whether any payments were accepted after a definitive closure date was known have not been independently established.

Still, the situation raises serious questions about the responsibilities of property operators toward individuals and families who depend on them for shelter.

Get our free mobile app

Mayor-President Boulet Addresses Exploitation of Vulnerable Residents

In Friday's announcement, Boulet directly addressed the treatment of vulnerable people living at properties where serious criminal activity has persisted.

"When property owners exploit some of our most vulnerable residents while serious criminal activity is allowed to persist around them, that is unacceptable," Boulet said.

"This is difficult work, and it takes all of us. I am grateful for the partners who continue to step forward and work through these complex issues with us. Our community deserves safe neighborhoods. Our people deserve safe, stable places to call home. And we will continue working together to deliver both."

The larger issue is particularly complicated because some individuals and families living in these motels have limited options.

A motel room may be expensive, inadequate, or unsafe, but for someone unable to qualify for a traditional apartment or secure affordable housing, it may also be the only available place to sleep.

That vulnerability can create an imbalance between operators and residents, especially when residents have nowhere else to go.

Plantation Motor Inn Residents Given Up to 45 Days

Unlike the Express Inn closure, Friday's court order involving the Plantation Motor Inn includes a transition period for current occupants.

Lafayette City Court Judge Roya Boustany issued a permanent injunction and order of abatement on October 9, following a preliminary hearing on September 30.

Under the judgment, the motel must cease operations for five years unless released sooner by the court.

Effective immediately, the Plantation Motor Inn cannot accept new guests or enter into new rental agreements.

However, existing occupants may remain through the expiration of their current arrangements, whether nightly, weekly, or longer-term, with no one permitted to remain beyond 45 days.

That does not necessarily mean every resident has 45 days to relocate.

Residents paying nightly may have considerably less time, depending on when their existing arrangements expire.

According to The Current, residents interviewed Friday morning said they were unaware that the motel might soon close. The outlet also reported that some longtime residents paying nightly were told Friday afternoon they would need to leave the following morning.

Housing Organizations Working to Assist Displaced Families

LCG says it has been coordinating with the Acadiana Regional Coalition on Homelessness & Housing (ARCH), the Lafayette Housing Authority, Lafayette Parish School System, and other community partners to help affected residents.

The efforts include connecting individuals and families with housing resources, relocation assistance, and potential alternative accommodations.

ARCH Executive Director Elsa Dimitriadis acknowledged that leaving a place someone considers home can be incredibly difficult, regardless of the circumstances.

"Our commitment is to walk alongside the residents affected by this transition, helping them navigate available resources and identify safe, stable housing options that meet their needs," Dimitriadis said.

"We want each person to know they are not facing this alone."

However, questions remain about how quickly assistance can reach everyone affected.

The Current reported that outreach personnel were not present at the Plantation Motor Inn when its reporter observed the property Friday evening, even as some residents faced the possibility of leaving the next morning.

While LCG says resources are being coordinated and assistance will continue, the availability of services does not necessarily mean every displaced household has already secured another place to live.

District Attorney Says More Problem Properties Could Face Action

The legal strategy being used against the two motels relies on Louisiana Revised Statutes 13:4711–4715, which provide a process for addressing properties associated with certain unlawful activities.

District Attorney Don Landry said his office intends to use available legal tools to target properties where dangerous criminal activity is allowed to persist.

"Fentanyl and heroin are killing our fellow Acadians. In recent years, someone in Acadiana died from an overdose every 36 hours," Landry said.

"If you harbor this kind of activity, the District Attorney's Office and our law enforcement partners will do everything in our power to shut you down."

Assistant District Attorney Chase Edwards described the effort as a way to prevent properties from serving as havens for drug trafficking and other criminal activity.

The closures also follow Lafayette's recent demolition of the former La Quinta Inn, another property along the Evangeline Thruway corridor that had drawn attention over deteriorating conditions.

A Difficult Balance Between Public Safety and Housing Stability

The controversy surrounding the Express Inn and Plantation Motor Inn closures highlights two problems that Lafayette officials and community organizations are now confronting simultaneously.

The first is the documented criminal activity and unsafe conditions associated with properties where people have continued to live.

The second is the shortage of accessible, affordable housing options for residents who may have nowhere else to turn.

The nearly 4,000 combined police calls and hundreds of reports associated with the motels provide substantial context for why authorities sought intervention.

At the same time, those numbers do not erase the immediate challenges facing families who may be displaced through no wrongdoing of their own.

There are legitimate questions about whether residents received adequate notice, whether motel management fulfilled its responsibilities, and whether housing assistance can keep pace with the closures.

What is clear is that the legal actions did not develop overnight, even if some residents learned of their consequences at the last minute.

As Lafayette continues its effort to address crime and blight along the Evangeline Thruway, the success of that effort will involve more than closing problematic properties.

It will also depend on what happens to the people who lived inside them.